1997
DOI: 10.1216/jiea/1181075985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solution of Periodic Fredholm Integral Equations of the Second Kind by Means of Attenuation Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the presence of the sign function in ρ m makes them all quite different from the corresponding expressions for the general Fredholm equation in Berrut & Reifenberg (1997). The same is true also for the evaluation of the approximate solution in the following paragraph.…”
Section: Examples Of the Use Of Some Interpolation Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the presence of the sign function in ρ m makes them all quite different from the corresponding expressions for the general Fredholm equation in Berrut & Reifenberg (1997). The same is true also for the evaluation of the approximate solution in the following paragraph.…”
Section: Examples Of the Use Of Some Interpolation Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In Berrut & Reifenberg (1997) we solved Fredholm integral equations of the second kind x + Hx = f by approximating the operator H :…”
Section: The Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed data smoothing has been initially developed to separate smooth patterns in data from the rough sequence corresponding to (experimental) noise. A great number of techniques has been developed to perform data smoothing, based on kernel regression [26], polynomial regression [27], attenuation factors [28] and polynomial smoothing splines [29][30][31], among others. In the context of FFT-based solvers applied to field dislocation mechanics, it is worth noting that Brenner et al [8] proposed to spread the dislocation density corresponding to pixel-wise single dislocations on a surface of 3 × 3 pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%