1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solution of Optimal Design Problems for Binary Gratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is still the necessity to cross-check the resulting designs with a more exact, that is an electromagnetic-theory-based computational method, as the risk of falsely predicting an important specification can be significantly reduced in this way. In order to combine the benefits of scalar and electromagnetic diffraction theories, one can think of direct electromagnetic-theory based post-optimization of gratings as for example in [20] with starting values obtained from (fast) scalar methods, or of using an electromagnetic-theory-based propagation operator within the algorithms discussed in this paper (B.H. Kleemann 2004, private communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still the necessity to cross-check the resulting designs with a more exact, that is an electromagnetic-theory-based computational method, as the risk of falsely predicting an important specification can be significantly reduced in this way. In order to combine the benefits of scalar and electromagnetic diffraction theories, one can think of direct electromagnetic-theory based post-optimization of gratings as for example in [20] with starting values obtained from (fast) scalar methods, or of using an electromagnetic-theory-based propagation operator within the algorithms discussed in this paper (B.H. Kleemann 2004, private communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the FE method described there converges in context with TM polarization only for certain special materials. This problem is solved by Elschner and Schmidt at the WIAS by an improved formulation FEM procedure [9,10,11]. Thus, stability and convergence for both cases of polarization and almost arbitrary materials are obtained.…”
Section: The Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the Helmholtz equations are solved for finite homogenous elements with continuous boundary conditions. The program package DiPoG from the Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS), Berlin, Germany is based on this method, which originally has been formulated by of Bao et al [9] and been improved by the authors of DiPoG, Elschner, Schmidt, Hinder, and Rathsfeld [10,11,12]. DiPoG uses a different approximation to the real geometrical structures than Microsim.…”
Section: The Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%