2007
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9246-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of an inverse diffusion problem for the moisture transfer coefficient in a porous material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is extensive experience in the field of inverse problems and parameter estimation. The works of Carmeliet and Roels [15], Roels et al [16], Gómez et al [17], Galván et al [18], Amirkhanov [19] and Rouchier et al [20] are examples of parameter estimation from laboratory tests. One of these approaches could be adopted together with the freeware codes included in the review by Delgado et al [8], or any other numerical solver, for the solution of the direct problem (simulation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive experience in the field of inverse problems and parameter estimation. The works of Carmeliet and Roels [15], Roels et al [16], Gómez et al [17], Galván et al [18], Amirkhanov [19] and Rouchier et al [20] are examples of parameter estimation from laboratory tests. One of these approaches could be adopted together with the freeware codes included in the review by Delgado et al [8], or any other numerical solver, for the solution of the direct problem (simulation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open face is 12 × 3 cm 2 . Similarly to work [Amirkhanov, Pavlušova, Pavluš 2008], we take values of water concentration in points x = 89.1; 88.2; 87.3; 86.4; 85.5 mm from the side of the open edge of the brick using the humidity distribution plot [Pleinert, 1998]. We get the following plot for these points at the left picture and corresponding approximation by the function w = a + be −t at the right picture (Fig.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamic Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%