2016
DOI: 10.1515/jiip-2016-0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of an ill-posed Cauchy problem for a quasilinear parabolic equation using a Carleman weight function

Abstract: This is the first publication in which an ill-posed Cauchy problem for a quasilinear PDE is solved numerically by a rigorous method. More precisely, we solve the side Cauchy problem for a 1-d quasilinear parabolc equation. The key idea is to minimize a strictly convex cost functional with the Carleman Weight Function in it. Previous publications about numerical solutions of ill-posed Cauchy problems were considering only linear equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. We point out that, compared with previous publications [5,11,12,16,17,18,19] on the topic of this paper, a significantly new element of Theorems 3.3-3.5 is that now the existence of the global minimum v min is asserted rather than assumed. This became possible because of results of convex analysis of section 2.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1. We point out that, compared with previous publications [5,11,12,16,17,18,19] on the topic of this paper, a significantly new element of Theorems 3.3-3.5 is that now the existence of the global minimum v min is asserted rather than assumed. This became possible because of results of convex analysis of section 2.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, we now need to prove the Lipschitz continuity of the Frechét derivative of our cost functional, which was not done in those previous works. These factors, in turn mean that proofs of main theorems here are different from their analogs in [17,19]. So, we prove the corresponding theorems below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, we consider in the current paper, so as in [24,25,26,33], the fundamental solution of the corresponding PDE. The differences between the fundamental solutions of those PDEs and solutions satisfying non-vanishing conditions cause quite significant differences between [24, 25, 26, 33] and [6, 7, 10, 29] of corresponding versions of the GCM of the second type.Recently, the idea of the GCM of the second type was extended to the case of ill-posed Cauchy problems for quasilinear PDEs, see the theory in [28] and some extensions and numerical examples in [4,30].CIPs of wave propagation are a part of a bigger subfield, Inverse Scattering Problems (ISPs). ISPs attract a significant attention of the scientific community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%