2009
DOI: 10.1002/num.20492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of the improved Boussinesq equation

Abstract: In this study, numerical simulations of the improved Boussinesq equation are obtained using two finite difference schemes and two finite element methods, based on the second-and third-order time discretization. The methods are tested on the problems of propagation of a soliton and interaction of two solitons. After the L ∞ error norm is used to measure differences between the exact and numerical solutions, the results obtained by the proposed methods are compared with recently published results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the schemes also have good conservative properties. The capacity of our methods in simulating the soliton phenomena is also verified, and results are in good agreement with the available results [12,15,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Besides the schemes also have good conservative properties. The capacity of our methods in simulating the soliton phenomena is also verified, and results are in good agreement with the available results [12,15,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In Table , we present the L errors, the maximum energy errors and CPU time of various methods. It is clearly seen that the proposed energy‐preserving schemes not only can precisely conserve the discrete energy but also have better long‐time computation ability and higher accuracy than the known studied methods . However, our proposed methods need a larger computational cost than that of the other methods, due to the fact that HBVMs are fully‐implicit.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations