2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063780x07110062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of plasma equilibrium in a one-dimensional current sheet with a nonzero normal magnetic field component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

7
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these studies are consistent in many respects with numerical simulation results [33,34] and earlier esti mates [35]. At present, the TCS theory is presented by two groups of analytical models ( [3,36] and [37,38]) and a number of numerical models of the TCS struc ture and formation mechanisms [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The results of these studies are consistent in many respects with numerical simulation results [33,34] and earlier esti mates [35]. At present, the TCS theory is presented by two groups of analytical models ( [3,36] and [37,38]) and a number of numerical models of the TCS struc ture and formation mechanisms [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This latter mechanism relies on asymmetric particle scattering at TCS in the presence of a global sheared magnetic component. In this study, we generalize two complementary models of anisotropic TCSs: (1) an analytical model based on a solution of Vlasov‐Maxwell equations [e.g., Zelenyi et al , 2004], and (2) a particle‐in‐cell (PIC) numerical model [ Mingalev et al , 2007, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input parameters for the modeling runs are as follows: (1) magnetic field variation through the TCS Δ B x =40 nT, and B z =1 nT, similar to the values in the magnetotail [ Mingalev et al , ]; (2) the proton temperature T 0 =4 keV with the related V T ≈620 km/s and ρ T ∼320 km; The half‐width of the simulation box is taken to be 6400 km, which is several times larger than ρ T and the expected size of the TCS. The applied mesh size is h = 6400/640 = 10 km, which is higher than the Debye radius in the system of about 1 km, ensuring, therefore, the condition of quasi‐neutrality.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%