2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.40049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations of Effects of Micro Vortex Generators Using Immersed-Boundary Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned larger magnitude in the neck region of MR4 is represented by the mismatch of the boundary layer profiles, indicating that this part does not follow a scaling with the ramp dimensions. The streamwise velocity profile in the center plane has also been inspected in the previous LDA study of Babinsky et al [8] and RANS study of Ghosh et al [12]. Both studies were carried out at Ma=2.…”
Section: Fig 5 Contours Of Streamwise Velocity Of Mr3 (Top) and Mr4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aforementioned larger magnitude in the neck region of MR4 is represented by the mismatch of the boundary layer profiles, indicating that this part does not follow a scaling with the ramp dimensions. The streamwise velocity profile in the center plane has also been inspected in the previous LDA study of Babinsky et al [8] and RANS study of Ghosh et al [12]. Both studies were carried out at Ma=2.…”
Section: Fig 5 Contours Of Streamwise Velocity Of Mr3 (Top) and Mr4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation with immersed-boundary treatment was performed by Ghosh et al [12] (Ma=2.5, h/δ=0.46, 0.92) and the velocity profiles were compared with experiment data [8]. An acceptable agreement was only achieved for the larger micro-ramp (h/δ=0.92).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered to be a hopeful substitution for bleeding control. In contrast to the conventional counterpart, the microramp vortex generator has the smaller size (approximately the height 20-40% of the boundary layer), longer streamwise distance for the vortices to remain in the boundary layer, and therefore better efficiency of the momentum exchange 9,10 . In Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the conventional counterpart, MVG has the smaller size (approximately the height 20-40% of the boundary layer), longer streamwise distance for the vortices to remain in the boundary layer, and therefore better efficiency of the M momentum exchange [1] [2]. In Lin's review [3] on the low-profile vortex generator, it was mentioned that MVG could alleviate the flow distortion in compact ducts to some extent and control boundary layer separation due to the adverse pressure gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%