2021
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of depressurization‐induced gas production from hydrate reservoirs at site GMGS3‐W19 with different free gas saturations in the northern South China Sea

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial conditions of the hydrate reservoir are determined according to the process described by Moridis et al , The top and bottom boundaries of the simulated domain (corresponding to the uppermost and lowermost grid block layers, respectively) are set as a constant pressure and temperature. , The geothermal gradient at this site is 0.0443 °C/m with a seabed temperature of 3.7 °C, and the pressure in the sediments is considered to follow a hydrostatic distribution. Then, the temperature and pressure of the boundary layers can be determined, where the pressure is calculated using the pressure, temperature, and salinity-adjusted water density .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial conditions of the hydrate reservoir are determined according to the process described by Moridis et al , The top and bottom boundaries of the simulated domain (corresponding to the uppermost and lowermost grid block layers, respectively) are set as a constant pressure and temperature. , The geothermal gradient at this site is 0.0443 °C/m with a seabed temperature of 3.7 °C, and the pressure in the sediments is considered to follow a hydrostatic distribution. Then, the temperature and pressure of the boundary layers can be determined, where the pressure is calculated using the pressure, temperature, and salinity-adjusted water density .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the efficiency of gas production and energy loss in coproduction of NGH-SG reservoirs, we have established an evaluation panel for the gas−water ratio and yield-loss ratio under different reservoir conditions at 60 days and 3000 days of CP, as illustrated in Figure 12. The gas−water ratio (R GW = V G /V W ) is a critical indicator for evaluating gas production efficiency, 48 and a higher R GW signifies favorable economic feasibility of gas production. 40 During the development of NGH and SG, a unique phenomenon of cross-flow gas loss may occur.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Energy Recovery Of Ngh-sg Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 1-4 is selected as the control group, and its injection–production parameters (T i , P p , and P i are 90 °C, 6 MPa, and 18 MPa, respectively) are used in case 0. Mao et al and Moridis et al , set the thickness of the overlying layer as the distance from the upper boundary of the HBS to the seafloor (136.4 and 217 m, respectively), and the thicknesses of the underlying layer are 200 and 330 m, respectively. Their results determined that those thicknesses are enough to provide a reliable model of pressure and temperature distribution.…”
Section: Numerical Model and Simulation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%