2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of cessation flows of a Bingham plastic with the augmented Lagrangian method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of papers, Frigaard and coworkers pointed out some drawbacks of the regularization approach (Moyers- Gonzalez and Frigaard, 2004;Frigaard and Nouar, 2005;Putz et al, 2009). Finally, the augmented Lagrangian algorithm became the most popular way to solve viscoplastic flow problems because of its accuracy (Muravleva et al, 2010;Dimakopoulos et al, 2013), despite the fact that the regularization approach runs in general faster. The Rheolef library, a free software developed by one of the authors of this review article and supporting both the augmented Lagrangian algorithm and an autoadaptive mesh technique, is now widely used for various flow applications (Putz and Frigaard, 2010;Roustaei and Frigaard, 2013;Wachs and Frigaard, 2016;Boujlel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a series of papers, Frigaard and coworkers pointed out some drawbacks of the regularization approach (Moyers- Gonzalez and Frigaard, 2004;Frigaard and Nouar, 2005;Putz et al, 2009). Finally, the augmented Lagrangian algorithm became the most popular way to solve viscoplastic flow problems because of its accuracy (Muravleva et al, 2010;Dimakopoulos et al, 2013), despite the fact that the regularization approach runs in general faster. The Rheolef library, a free software developed by one of the authors of this review article and supporting both the augmented Lagrangian algorithm and an autoadaptive mesh technique, is now widely used for various flow applications (Putz and Frigaard, 2010;Roustaei and Frigaard, 2013;Wachs and Frigaard, 2016;Boujlel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Couette flow, there is no motionless unyielded region anymore and the position of the yielded surface is difficult to determine. Finally, with this modified problem, return to rest in finite time and quiescent state (Muravleva et al, 2010) cannot be captured: the flow never fully stops when the load is lower than the critical value. The finite time decay, quiescent state and limit load analysis can not be established clearly.…”
Section: The Regularization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important computation issue is the accurate tracking of the yield surfaces. Compared to the regularization method, the augmented Lagrangian method yields superior results regarding the location of the yield surface and explorations of the plastic limit, for example, in simulation of the flow cessation [38], [41] or no-flow limit [35]. According to [30], "pragmatically, the choice between augmented Lagrangian and regularization is related to whether one needs to determine the position of the yield surface, or whether a reasonable approximation to the velocity field is sufficient".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, the subject matter of viscoplasticity/viscoelastoplasticity remains a hotly debated and challenging topic, which has provoked more than a thousand papers prior to 2005 (see Mitsoulis 2007). In addition, some authors have employed the augmented Lagrangian approach and applied it to problems of viscoplasticity (see, for example, Roquet and Saramito 2001, Huilgol and You 2005and Muravleva et al 2010). These authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of the augmented Lagrangian method for this type of problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%