2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations in Support of a Long-Term Test of Gas Production from Hydrate Accumulations on the Alaska North Slope: Reservoir Response to Interruptions of Production (Shut-Ins)

Abstract: We investigate by means of numerical simulation a planned year-long field test of depressurization-induced production from a permafrost-associated hydrate reservoir on the Alaska North Slope at the site of the recently-drilled Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well. The main objective of this study is to assess quantitatively the impact of temporary interruptions (well shutins) on the expected fluid production performance from the B1 Sand of the stratigraphic Unit B during controlled depressurization over differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In December 2018, as a part of the science programs toward a long-term production test, the Hydrate-01 STW was drilled at the Kuparuk 7-11-12 site, and multiple geological/geophysical data were obtained through LWD and sidewall core sampling in the target MH reservoirs (the B1 and D1 sands) and their sealing layers . On the basis of these data obtained from Hydrate-01 STW, the project partners constructed 2D/3D reservoir simulation models (the PBU Kuparuk 7-11-12 2D/3D reservoir model) and conducted several studies based on those simulation models to support the design of the production test. Myshakin conducted a 2D simulation study for predicting the gas and water production rate for a one-year production period in Unit-B under a simplified depressurization scenario where the bottom-hole flowing pressure is 3 MPa constant to establish the design of production wells, surface production facilities, and observation wells . In addition, to support the development of the production test plan, gas and water production behaviors under more likely depressurization scenarios including multiple shut-ins based on the 2D simulation model and optimizing the simulated perforation interval to suppress water production and maintain gas production were investigated. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In December 2018, as a part of the science programs toward a long-term production test, the Hydrate-01 STW was drilled at the Kuparuk 7-11-12 site, and multiple geological/geophysical data were obtained through LWD and sidewall core sampling in the target MH reservoirs (the B1 and D1 sands) and their sealing layers . On the basis of these data obtained from Hydrate-01 STW, the project partners constructed 2D/3D reservoir simulation models (the PBU Kuparuk 7-11-12 2D/3D reservoir model) and conducted several studies based on those simulation models to support the design of the production test. Myshakin conducted a 2D simulation study for predicting the gas and water production rate for a one-year production period in Unit-B under a simplified depressurization scenario where the bottom-hole flowing pressure is 3 MPa constant to establish the design of production wells, surface production facilities, and observation wells . In addition, to support the development of the production test plan, gas and water production behaviors under more likely depressurization scenarios including multiple shut-ins based on the 2D simulation model and optimizing the simulated perforation interval to suppress water production and maintain gas production were investigated. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International methane hydrate production programs (offshore in Japan, , China, , India, , and South Korea , and onshore in U.S. Alaska North Slope , ) have revealed high methane hydrate concentrations in sediments with significant permeabilities required for gas production. , …”
Section: Methane Hydrates As a Massive Bridge Fuel Clean-energy Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning for a gas hydrate production test and accurately interpreting the resulting data are dependent on thoroughly characterizing the reservoir itself as well as the nature of the gas hydrate within the reservoir. , More broadly, quantitatively characterizing natural gas hydrate deposits is essential for understanding the scale and occurrence patterns of gas hydrate deposits locally, regionally, and globally; such characterization informs studies of gas hydrate’s role in the carbon cycle, as a subsea hazard, and as an energy resource . Subsurface characterization to support the planned Alaska production test is provided by borehole log data , and sidewall core samples from the Hydrate-01 STW along with surface seismic and 3D distributed acoustic sensor (DAS) vertical seismic profile (VSP) data. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface and borehole geophysical data, such as seismic surveys, enable characterization over a larger spatial area; these approaches have been successfully used in conjunction with borehole data , and in the absence of borehole data. , The need for detailed subsurface characterization is greater in cases when production tests are planned, with reservoir characteristics and gas hydrate occurrence characteristics both needed for realistic modeling and planning. Accurate physical property estimates are critical for numerical modeling, which provides an essential tool for the planning and design of gas hydrate production tests. , As noted by Lee and Collett, many geophysical properties provide options for estimating gas hydrate saturation ( S gh ), but some of these estimates depend on the form that gas hydrate takes in the pore space (e.g., V P , V S , and electrical resistivity), whereas others relate more directly to the total amount of gas hydrate present (e.g., nuclear magnetic resonance, NMR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation