2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation study on two-phase flow of thermal runaway evolution and jet fire of 18650 lithium-ion battery under thermal abuse

Jia-hao Wang,
Ziqi Jiang,
Mei Mei
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Venting and TRP models, which consider venting, use the venting properties gas flow rate and gas velocity as interim parameters to couple models on cell domain level with CFD models. In the studies from [31][32][33]35,36] the simulated maximum vent flow velocities are almost always in the same order of magnitude to our measured velocities and range from 85 ms −1 [31] to approximately 162-178.3 ms −1 [32,33,35], or even up to 340 ms −1 in some cases [36]. However, there are differences in the TR duration and gas flow rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Venting and TRP models, which consider venting, use the venting properties gas flow rate and gas velocity as interim parameters to couple models on cell domain level with CFD models. In the studies from [31][32][33]35,36] the simulated maximum vent flow velocities are almost always in the same order of magnitude to our measured velocities and range from 85 ms −1 [31] to approximately 162-178.3 ms −1 [32,33,35], or even up to 340 ms −1 in some cases [36]. However, there are differences in the TR duration and gas flow rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The TR lasted more than five seconds except in the study from Mishra et al [36], where it took 2.27 s which is comparable to our measured TR duration with 1.718 ± 1.002 s for high-power and 1.131 ± 0.2909 s for high-energy LIBs. However, the simulated gas flow rates are given with 2.5 gs −1 [31] to 3.5 gs −1 [35] and one order of magnitude lower than our measured gas flow distribution with 22.15 ± 14.70 gs −1 for SonyVTC5A and 27.92 ± 9.500 gs −1 for LGMJ1 cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations