48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Vitiation Effects on a Hydrogen-Fueled Dual-Mode Scramjet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of the temperature at the wall shows to have an e¨ect on the peak combustion pressure, length, and location of the shock train. Similar in §uences were observed by Vyas et al [19]. Figure 19a shows the surface pressure distribution at the top wall for T wall = 300, 600, and 900 K with a constant equivalence ratio of φ = 0.55.…”
Section: In §Uence Of Wall Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The variation of the temperature at the wall shows to have an e¨ect on the peak combustion pressure, length, and location of the shock train. Similar in §uences were observed by Vyas et al [19]. Figure 19a shows the surface pressure distribution at the top wall for T wall = 300, 600, and 900 K with a constant equivalence ratio of φ = 0.55.…”
Section: In §Uence Of Wall Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The fuel injector geometry is a convergent-divergent nozzle. We have applied RANS based calculations to this configuration, 12,53,54 with much of the focus on determining the capability of CFD to replicate differences between clean air and vitiated air on engine performance as a function of fuel equivalence ratio. Gupte et al 55 used finite element analysis to examine the thermal-structural response of the UVA test article and found substantial effects of the thermal deformation on the predicted flowfield when comparing CFD solutions from the baseline to the thermally deformed configuration.…”
Section: Combustor / Exhaust System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 However, CFD results can match wall pressure data even when the flowfield is not correctly simulated, so the real test of the simulation is a comparison of CFD predictions to experimental measurements for velocity and other quantities in the core of the flow. All three components of velocity from CFD results are compared here to corresponding velocity components from SPIV measurements.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparison To Cfd Results Flowpathmentioning
confidence: 99%