2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of two-phase gas–liquid flow through gradual expansions/contractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of the shock waves was pronounced at low gas volume fraction but weakened with the increase of the void fraction. The bubbly flow through convergent/ divergent channels was investigated in details by Ahmadpour et al (2016) with Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) method. When the gas-liquid mixture flowed through the convergent/divergent section, a drastic increase in drag and virtual mass forces were obtained, especially higher drag force for the divergent section.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the shock waves was pronounced at low gas volume fraction but weakened with the increase of the void fraction. The bubbly flow through convergent/ divergent channels was investigated in details by Ahmadpour et al (2016) with Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) method. When the gas-liquid mixture flowed through the convergent/divergent section, a drastic increase in drag and virtual mass forces were obtained, especially higher drag force for the divergent section.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-phase momentum transfer term (Su,i) at the liquid-vapour interface accounts for the forces due to viscose drag (Fi,Drag), lift (Fi,lift), virtual mass (Fi,vm), turbulent dispersion (Fi,Dispersion) and wall lubrication force (Fq,wall) [39,40]:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the values fluctuate after the mesh number exceeds 6.0 × 10 5 , which can be consequently recognized as the appropriate mesh number. The numerical method in this paper is testified by simulating a gas-liquid flow process in the literature [20], as shown in Figure 5. The figure describes the axial pressure distribution at different The numerical method in this paper is testified by simulating a gas-liquid flow process in the literature [20], as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Independence Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical method in this paper is testified by simulating a gas-liquid flow process in the literature [20], as shown in Figure 5. The figure describes the axial pressure distribution at different The numerical method in this paper is testified by simulating a gas-liquid flow process in the literature [20], as shown in Figure 5. The figure describes the axial pressure distribution at different Reynolds numbers, and the simulated results acquired by the present method are in good agreement with the experiments, with the maximum error of less than 10%.…”
Section: Independence Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%