2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(99)00148-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of turbulent propane–air combustion with nonhomogeneous reactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
56
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
13
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Figures 8 and 9 indicate that increasing ϕ 0 for stratified cases increases the variability of burning irrespective of the nature of initial mixture distribution. The reduction in burning rate due to mixture stratification in globally stoichiometric mixtures is consistent with several previous analyses (Haworth et al, 2000;Jiménez et al, 2002;Malkeson and Chakraborty, 2010;Patel and Chakraborty, 2014;Renou et al, 2004;Samson, 2002;Zhou et al, 1998). The bimodal distribution cases show higher probability of finding 1:0 ϕ 1:10 than in the Gaussian distribution cases for l ϕ =l f > 2:1 (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Gaussian Distribution Case Gt4yd Bimodal Distribution Case Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Figures 8 and 9 indicate that increasing ϕ 0 for stratified cases increases the variability of burning irrespective of the nature of initial mixture distribution. The reduction in burning rate due to mixture stratification in globally stoichiometric mixtures is consistent with several previous analyses (Haworth et al, 2000;Jiménez et al, 2002;Malkeson and Chakraborty, 2010;Patel and Chakraborty, 2014;Renou et al, 2004;Samson, 2002;Zhou et al, 1998). The bimodal distribution cases show higher probability of finding 1:0 ϕ 1:10 than in the Gaussian distribution cases for l ϕ =l f > 2:1 (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Gaussian Distribution Case Gt4yd Bimodal Distribution Case Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A number of previous analyses concentrated on flame propagation in stratified mixtures based on experimental (Anselmo-Filho et al, 2009;Balusamy et al, 2014;Grune et al, 2013;Kang and Kyritsis, 2005;Mulla and Chakravarthy, 2014;Renou et al, 2004;Samson, 2002;Sweeney et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 1998Zhou et al, , 2013 and direct numerical simulations (DNS) (Cruz et al, 2000;Haworth et al, 2000;Hélie and Trouvé, 1998;Jiménez et al, 2002;Malkeson and Chakraborty, 2010;Patel and Chakraborty, 2014;Pera et al, 2013;Swaminathan et al, 2007) data. These studies demonstrated that the flame propagation statistics are strongly affected by the local gradient of equivalence ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a large proportion of numerical studies of hydrocarbon flames is confined either to simple and/or two-dimensional flows with full chemical kinetic schemes (see [12] and references therein) or to complex and/or three-dimensional flows with simple/reduced schemes (see [13] and references therein). However, it is worth noting that significant advances have been made in recent years towards simulating systems burning practically relevant fuels together with detailed and accurate models for both the chemical and transport phenomena [14][15][16]. Thanks to the rapid growth of computational capabilities, adequate numerical predictions of the turbulent burning velocity have been provided [17,18] up to laboratory scale configurations [19,20] using high fidelity DNS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional examples germane to this configuration include Baum et al [2] who studied turbulent flame interactions for detailed hydrogen chemistry and more recent studies by Chen and Im [3] and Im and Chen [4]. Haworth et al [5] examined the effect of inhomogeneous reactants for propane/air flames using detailed propane chemistry at conditions typical of an IC engine. Analogous studies in 3D have been performed by Rutland and Trouvé [6], Trouvé and Poinsot [7], Zhang and Rutland [8], and Chakraborty and Cant [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%