2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-016-0087-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flows Using a Least Squares Based Meshless Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic principle of using finite element method is that the body is divided into subdivisions or small isolated areas which are known as finite elements. Size of the stiffness matrix be determined by the number of nodes and the results are amended by increasing the number of nodes and collocation points (Jabbari 2016). Each element has governing equations in Fluent and these elements are accumulated into a global matrix.…”
Section: Solver Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principle of using finite element method is that the body is divided into subdivisions or small isolated areas which are known as finite elements. Size of the stiffness matrix be determined by the number of nodes and the results are amended by increasing the number of nodes and collocation points (Jabbari 2016). Each element has governing equations in Fluent and these elements are accumulated into a global matrix.…”
Section: Solver Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Experimental results a for velocity profile and b for turbulence intensity profile [55] into minor isolated parts which are called finite elements. The stiffness matrix size is determined by only the numeral of nodes and the outcomes are amended by increasing the nodes amount and collocation points [56]. The elements collectively make an overall matrix, and each element of the matrix has governed equations in Fluent.…”
Section: Solver Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 shows the evaluation of mid-plane u-velocity and v-velocity profiles at Re =1 × 10 4 and K = 1.0, presenting numerical results compared with earlier literature [31 , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] for top wall only moving with a velocity of U T =1. The excellent agreement between the existing and current studies establishes the simulation's validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%