Laminar-Turbulent Transition 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-84103-3_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Transition due to Crossflow Instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 At the same time, calculations (see, e.g., Refs. 3,15,[27][28][29] predict that the swept-wing boundary layer is the most unstable to the traveling waves, i.e., to the unsteady cross-flow instability modes. The traveling modes are also observed experimentally under "natural" conditions, but usually when the free-stream turbulence is relatively high and/or the surface is relatively smooth.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 At the same time, calculations (see, e.g., Refs. 3,15,[27][28][29] predict that the swept-wing boundary layer is the most unstable to the traveling waves, i.e., to the unsteady cross-flow instability modes. The traveling modes are also observed experimentally under "natural" conditions, but usually when the free-stream turbulence is relatively high and/or the surface is relatively smooth.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reed & Lin (1987) and Lin & Reed (1993) performed DNS for stationary waves on an infinite-span swept wing similar to the ASU experiments. Meyer & Kleiser (1990) investigated the disturbance interactions between stationary and traveling crossflow modes on a swept flat plate using Falkner-Scan-Cooke similarity profiles for the basic state. The results are compared to the experiments by Müller & Bippes (1989).…”
Section: Cfd Comparisons (Dns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 presents level curves of G at t = 165.6 in a strongly accelerated Falkner-Skan-Cooke flow subject exclusively to crossflow instability. The flow conditions correspond to the boundary layer studied extensively at the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) described by Bippes (1999); in particular they correspond to those used in investigations via temporal direct simulation by Meyer (1989) and Meyer & Kleiser (1990): R θ = 374, m = 0.46 and φ = 46.9 • . The boundaries of the exponentially unstable regions are indicated by heavy lines.…”
Section: Optimal Sweepmentioning
confidence: 99%