2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the wind-driven rainfall distribution over small-scale topography in space and time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17, which assumes a decreasing distance between parallel raindrop trajectories with increasing wind speed. The estimates also are consistent with the detailed 2-D numerical simulations of WDR modelled by Blocken et al (2005) for fine-scale topography. Their experiments yielded P e /P o ratios ranging from 0.46 to 1.37 depending on wind speed, distance from nearest hilltop, and windward or leeward location.…”
Section: Wind-driven Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…17, which assumes a decreasing distance between parallel raindrop trajectories with increasing wind speed. The estimates also are consistent with the detailed 2-D numerical simulations of WDR modelled by Blocken et al (2005) for fine-scale topography. Their experiments yielded P e /P o ratios ranging from 0.46 to 1.37 depending on wind speed, distance from nearest hilltop, and windward or leeward location.…”
Section: Wind-driven Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The uniformity coefficients of the rainfall intensity changed from 82% for the rains driven by wind speed of 12.0 ms − 1 with the nozzle pressure of 75 kPa to 92% for those driven by 6.4 ms − 1 with the nozzle pressure of 150 kPa (Erpul, 1996). The actual amount of rain intercepted on a sloping surface with respect to the prevailing wind direction was calculated with the angle of rain incidence using the correction factors (Sharon, 1970(Sharon, , 1980Sharon et al, 1983Sharon et al, , 1988De Lima, 1990;Sharon and Arazi, 1997;Blocken and Carmeliet, 2000, 2002, 2004Blocken et al, 2005;Cornelis et al, 2004a;Blocken et al, 2006):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the WDR effect focuses on the precipitation trajectories affected by topography-conditioned perturbations of the local wind field at a much finer scale featured by microtopography, which is not part of the rainfall generation process. WDR has also been extensively investigated with both observation data and fluid mechanical models (Sharon and Arazi, 1997;Blocken et al, 2005;Lehning et al, 2008). In general, the orographic effect entails precipitation climatology at the scale of around or larger than 100 km, whereas the WDR effect describes the redistribution of rainfall by microtopographic features of less than around 1 km.…”
Section: Liu Et Al: Interaction Of Valleys and Cps On Spatial Prementioning
confidence: 99%