2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14195533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Whole Thermal Lensing Process with Z-Scan-Based Methods Using Gaussian Beams

Abstract: A general study of the diffracted far field due to thermal lens heating using Gaussian beams is presented. The numerical simulation considers the whole system, including both the optical and the thermal parameters. It is shown that the existing simplified relations found in the literature and used up to now only give the order of magnitude of the thermo-optical coefficients. More accurate, simplified formulas are derived to measure the induced thermal phase shift when working with Z-scan-based methods. Tempera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the obtained signal with the one given by Equation (5) shows that even if they have a similar profile, their amplitude can be very different. Taking into account the experimental parameters which are the same as those considered in the simulation of [ 15 ], we obtained that the measurement procedure of underestimated its value by 60%. Coming back to the OPM measurements, and taking into account the standard deviation σ over the different observations, the results that are shown in Figure 3 give an average value of the absorption: .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison of the obtained signal with the one given by Equation (5) shows that even if they have a similar profile, their amplitude can be very different. Taking into account the experimental parameters which are the same as those considered in the simulation of [ 15 ], we obtained that the measurement procedure of underestimated its value by 60%. Coming back to the OPM measurements, and taking into account the standard deviation σ over the different observations, the results that are shown in Figure 3 give an average value of the absorption: .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, for each acquisition the absorption was measured owing to the OPM and the TL processing as explained previously. The obtained α values were not equal especially because the equation used for the fitting according to Equation (5) is derived with too many approximations, as is shown in reference [ 15 ]. Indeed, in the latter reference, based on the Helmoltz equation, the diffracted intensity profiles at finite distance were calculated numerically without any approximation considering the whole system, including the optical and the thermal parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations