1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(94)90029-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the propagation of shock waves in compressible open-cell porous foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of the animal thoracic visceral injury under blast loading, Cooper et al [12] found that the transmitted overpressure from air to water was enhanced significantly and the severity of animal lung injury increased by using a foam layer as protective material. Similar phenomenon was also observed in the experimental investigation on compressible cellular foam material subjected to shock wave [13,14] loading. These experiment results are contrary to our expectation of using metallic foam as protective layer [15][16][17] to attenuate body or structural injury.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In a study of the animal thoracic visceral injury under blast loading, Cooper et al [12] found that the transmitted overpressure from air to water was enhanced significantly and the severity of animal lung injury increased by using a foam layer as protective material. Similar phenomenon was also observed in the experimental investigation on compressible cellular foam material subjected to shock wave [13,14] loading. These experiment results are contrary to our expectation of using metallic foam as protective layer [15][16][17] to attenuate body or structural injury.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, in order to check whether their model is capable of reproducing our experimental results one must determine experimentally two parameters of the non-linear permeability which appear in the Darcy and the Forchheimer terms (for details see equation (2) in van der Grinten et al 1985 or equation (3) in Olim et al 1993). Based on the above described observations it is clear that the existing well accepted model for describing the presently investigated interaction phenomenon is insufficient, because it cannot account for the fact that the transmitted compaction wave, C,, develops a disperse structure and the reflected shock wave, S~, accelerates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, differences of up to 1000 times exist in β between the steady flow value and unsteady shock tube flow value for the present experimental conditions with the incident shock Mach number of M s = 1.7 (P 4 /P 1 = 1.47 MPa/0.1 MPa). Olim et al (1994) compared the values of the permeability coefficients in shocked gas flow with those in steady flow, for M s = 1.25 ∼ 1.4 (P 4 /P 1 ∼ = 0.245 MPa/0.086 MPa ∼ 0.425 MPa/0.086 MPa). In their cases, differences of 5 to 8 times existed in the permeability coefficients between the shocked and steady gas flow values.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%