2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/583532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Hydrogen Dispersion Behavior by a Parallel Characteristic Curve Method

Abstract: A parallel characteristic curve method is applied in domain decomposition system to simulate the dispersion behavior of hydrogen in this work. The characteristic curve method is employed to approximate the Navier-Stokes equations and the convection diffusion equation, and the feasibility of solving complex multicomponent flow problems is demonstrated by the numerical simulation of hydrogen dispersion in a partially open space. An analogy of the Boussinesq approximation is applied and numerical results are vali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5, where 0% indicates that the entire volume is occupied by air and 100% represents the opposite, it can be seen that the current numerical results of all 4 sensors agree with the experimental data very well. Due to the acceleration and dilution of air, some oscillations are viewed at sensor 2 and sensor 3 (located at the top of the ventilation model) after 150 s. Compared with numerical results in [1,8,30], the current numerical results are more stable and closer to the experimental data and thus are more reliable.…”
Section: Efficiency Testmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In Figure 5, where 0% indicates that the entire volume is occupied by air and 100% represents the opposite, it can be seen that the current numerical results of all 4 sensors agree with the experimental data very well. Due to the acceleration and dilution of air, some oscillations are viewed at sensor 2 and sensor 3 (located at the top of the ventilation model) after 150 s. Compared with numerical results in [1,8,30], the current numerical results are more stable and closer to the experimental data and thus are more reliable.…”
Section: Efficiency Testmentioning
confidence: 66%