2006
DOI: 10.1205/cherd.05077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Formation of Constricted Waterjets in Hydroentangling Nozzles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because they stay laminar for a wider range of velocities and therefore they have a longer breakup length as compared to nonconstricted waterjets at the same pressures. Constricted waterjets may form either in nozzles with length-to-diameter ratios smaller than 0.7 (Anantharamaiah et al, 2006) (not the case of hydroentangling nozzles) or in any nozzle that undergoes a so-called "hydraulic flip". Hydraulic flip is the condition where cavitation cloud in a cavitating nozzle reaches the nozzle outlet and allows the downstream ambient air to flow inside the nozzle and envelop the waterjet.…”
Section: Hydroentangling Waterjetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because they stay laminar for a wider range of velocities and therefore they have a longer breakup length as compared to nonconstricted waterjets at the same pressures. Constricted waterjets may form either in nozzles with length-to-diameter ratios smaller than 0.7 (Anantharamaiah et al, 2006) (not the case of hydroentangling nozzles) or in any nozzle that undergoes a so-called "hydraulic flip". Hydraulic flip is the condition where cavitation cloud in a cavitating nozzle reaches the nozzle outlet and allows the downstream ambient air to flow inside the nozzle and envelop the waterjet.…”
Section: Hydroentangling Waterjetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial flow model used in this study was the VOF method along with the CSF model to consider the surface tension effect. The paper of Anantharamaiah et al (2006) provides extensive discussions of the effect of nozzle geometry on the formation of constricted waterjets, which have an air gap between the liquid and nozzle wall. In this study, the VOF method together with the CSF model was used as the two-phase flow model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anantharamaiah et al adopted and improved the design by adding components for adjusting the height as well and varying the jet pressure from 1000 to 3000 psi (6.89 to 20.68 MPa). 19 Their results established that the waterjet impact force was linearly proportional to the velocity and flow rate as long as the jet remains coherent and laminar. If the jet broke up and became a spray, its impact force was reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Begenir and colleagues, 2,16 Ghassemieh et al, 3 and others employed specially designed rigs as substitutes for the hydroentanglement machines in their experiments. [17][18][19] Ghassemieh et al measured the waterjet impact force of a single waterjet using a modified apparatus, 3 consisting of a laboratory setup, to measure the magnitude of the force with the waterjet nozzle operating between 3 to 12 MPa. Begenir used a design which closely resembled the industrial unit in her experimental set-up operated at high waterjet pressures of up to 400 bar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%