2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063784207110023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the field distribution produced by the SP-40 magnet of the MARUSYA setup and comparison of simulation results with experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D magneticˇeld calculation is carried out using the method of two scalar potentials [2]. Solving the boundary value problem (see [2]), we replace derivatives by their difference analogues and assume the magnetic permeability μ constant within one cell and equal to the value at the cell center. We obtain the system of nonlinear equations for determination of the discrete function u i,j,k = u (i, j, k):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D magneticˇeld calculation is carried out using the method of two scalar potentials [2]. Solving the boundary value problem (see [2]), we replace derivatives by their difference analogues and assume the magnetic permeability μ constant within one cell and equal to the value at the cell center. We obtain the system of nonlinear equations for determination of the discrete function u i,j,k = u (i, j, k):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two specialized beam channels for the following secondary beams: electrons, muons, pions, kaons, protons, neutrons, and light nuclei, will be built in the framework of the project. The High Momentum Channel will provide particle momenta from 800 MeV/c to 10 GeV/c, and the Low Momentum Channel based on the existing magnetooptical channel of MARUSYA setup [16], will provide particle momenta from 100 MeV/c to 2 GeV/c. This Test Zone will provide the conditions for testing new types of detectors to be installed in direct vicinity of the extracted ion beam.…”
Section: Test Zone With Secondary Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%