2003
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/22/355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the dynamic structure factor of a two-component model plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equilibrium and nonequilibrium nonideal plasmas have been studied extensively by MD in the past several decades [14][15][16][17][18]. Nevertheless, there are few studies of the spatially inhomogeneous systems such as electric double layers or plasma sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium and nonequilibrium nonideal plasmas have been studied extensively by MD in the past several decades [14][15][16][17][18]. Nevertheless, there are few studies of the spatially inhomogeneous systems such as electric double layers or plasma sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further extension of the present mixed approach to more recent data for the model systems described by other effective potentials [5,25] is planned. Table I, but for Γ = 0.5, r s = 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] and [4], (ii) the TCP dynamic characteristics in a different range of values of the wavenumber were investigated in Ref. [5].…”
Section: Classical Molecular Dynamics (Md) Simulations Of Model Two-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] described in Section2 is qualitatively good. The introduction of the non-constant Nevanlinna parameter function (2.17), accounting for the exact high-frequency asymptotic expansion of the system dielectric function, permits to obtain a better agreement with respect to the position of the plasmon peaks, and also leads to an adequate broadening (damping) of the plasmon mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…[40] with =0.7795 Figure 2.4 -Normalized charge-charge dynamic structure factor vs. frequency at Г = 2 and = 0.4.…”
Section: Nevanlinna Parameter Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%