2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of tearing–fatigue interactions in 316l(N) austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows the fracture surface of the nanostructured titania coating specimen that failed at σ = 355 MPa, N = 128,500 cycles. The nanostructured titania coating exhibits ductile tearing, feature A, a characteristic of bulk materials [19]. It is not common for thermal spray ceramic coatings to exhibit such characteristics.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Fracture Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 shows the fracture surface of the nanostructured titania coating specimen that failed at σ = 355 MPa, N = 128,500 cycles. The nanostructured titania coating exhibits ductile tearing, feature A, a characteristic of bulk materials [19]. It is not common for thermal spray ceramic coatings to exhibit such characteristics.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Fracture Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to present, various FE damage models [1][2][3][4][5][6] have been proposed and applied to simulate ductile fracture under cyclic loading conditions. [7][8][9][10][11] In most of existing works, ductile fracture simulation was performed for fracture specimens under cyclic loading. The authors developed the damage model based on multiaxial fracture strain energy and applied the model to simulate the ductile tearing under cyclic loading condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reports related to cyclic JeR curves can be broadly classified under two categories: (a) tests done at load ratio R > 0 and (b) those carried out at R < 0. The available literature on cyclic JeR curves [5,6] for load ratio R > 0 suggest that there is either marginal or no change in the JeR curve, whereas results generated for the condition of R < 0 indicate considerable degradation of fracture resistance with negative R ratio [7]. The degradation in fracture resistance under cyclic loading has been attributed to the fact that crack tip gets sharper under alternating stress conditions at negative R ratio [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%