Numerical simulation of particulate suspension transport and permeability impairment in an actual rough fracture under normal stresses

Abstract

The transportation and capture of particulate suspension in a rough fracture are widely encountered in hydrocarbon exploitation. According to a full review of the literature, traditional studies mainly focus on the placement and settlement of coarse particles such as proppants and lost circulation materials. Furthermore, a fracture is often considered to be equivalent to smooth parallel plates, whereas actual fractures are roughly walled with microconvex and are affected by normal stresses. The particulate suspension transport mechanism in a fracture under different normal stresses is still unclear. This paper proposes an approach to evaluate the permeability impairment caused by size‐exclusion of solid particles in a fracture under different normal stresses. The morphology of fracture flow space under different normal stresses is obtained by using optical scanning and FEM. Furthermore, the unresolved CFD‐DEM method is used to study the mechanism of the capture and migration of the particulate suspension in a fracture. The simulation results are in agreement with the experimental results. Furthermore, the effects of the particle size, particle concentration, injected particle volume, fracture occurrence, and applied pressure on particle invasion are discussed.

Numerical simulations of sand‐screen performance in unconsolidated prepacked gravel screen

“…Research indicates particles are less likely to plug the opening when the opening size exceeds twice the particle size. 56,57 However, when one side of the outer protective shroud is filled with gravel particles, part of the volume of these particles occupies the punched slot's space. This occupancy leads to a substantial reduction in the slot's flow area.…”

A novel model for calculating critical droplet entrainment rate of gas well considering droplet deformation and multiple parameters

“…Investigations indicate that the drag coefficient is considerably related to droplet shape and Reynolds number. [28][29][30] The calculation formula for the drag coefficient is usually empirical and derived by fitting a standard resistance curve. This curve demonstrates the relationship between drag coefficient (C d ) and Reynolds number (Re) obtained by testing a single rigid sphere moving at a constant velocity in a stationary, isothermal, incompressible, and infinite flow field.…”

“…Min Li, 7 however, suggested that the drag coefficient should be set to 1 for the windward area, which varies as a result of the droplet deformation in high‐speed airflow. Investigations indicate that the drag coefficient is considerably related to droplet shape and Reynolds number 28‐30 …”

Study on particle plugging in propagating fractures based on CFD-DEM

“…Zhang (2019a) investigated the wall effect and hydrodynamic behavior in coupled rough fracture with CFD-DEM method. In addition, particle bridging and size exclusion effects in regular fractures (Pu and Wang, 2014;Dai and Grace, 2016;Zeng et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2018;Jia et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020) and uncoupled actual fractures (Feng et al, 2018) have also been investigated extensively, and a large number of quantitative relationships between the particle bridging probability and particle concentration, particle size and fracture width have been proposed. Zhu et al (2020) also analyzed the particle plugging behavior during the dynamic variation of fracture width under positive pressure difference with a combined CFD-DEM finite element method.…”