2010
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.20316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of liquid spray dispersion in a fluidized bed

Abstract: A numerical model that simulates liquid spray dispersion in the fluidized bed of solid particles is presented. The model includes flow through the atomization device (nozzle), phase inversion and formation of the spray, its interaction with the solid particles, and liquid propagation within the bed. All these processes are modelled simultaneously to reflect the couplings existing between them. The model utilises a Eulerian description for all three phases to allow for the continuous computations throughout the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid concentration in the lower area is higher than that in the upper area. Therefore, the collision frequency between droplets and bed material is higher when using the countercurrent spray . This leads to a higher fraction of Ca­(OH) 2 particles adhering to the bed material surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solid concentration in the lower area is higher than that in the upper area. Therefore, the collision frequency between droplets and bed material is higher when using the countercurrent spray . This leads to a higher fraction of Ca­(OH) 2 particles adhering to the bed material surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the collision frequency between droplets and bed material is higher when using the countercurrent spray. 27 This leads to a higher fraction of Ca(OH) 2 particles adhering to the bed material surface. Hence, the average reaction time of SO 2 with Ca(OH) 2 increases when using the countercurrent spray.…”
Section: Energy and Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the assumption that scaled‐down 2.2 mm spray nozzles would be used in a Fluid Coker. To obtain truly relevant values, the agglomerates produced in a smaller‐scale fluidized bed would need to be scaled‐up to match those produced with commercial‐scale nozzles in a Fluid Coker …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by confining the jet with a draft tube located downstream of the spray nozzle tip. , The distance from the nozzle tip should be such as to allow for sufficient particle entrainment into the jet cavity. ,, The entrainment of particles into the jet can also be improved by modifying the draft tube geometry . Although a draft tube will reduce particle entrainment into the jet, therefore increasing the average liquid content of the wet solids formed at the tip of the jet, its beneficial impact results from the reduction of variations in liquid content within the wet solids; CFD modeling confirmed that a draft tube reduces the amount of the wettest agglomerates, which are the most resistant to breakup in the fluidized bed. , Draft tubes have also been shown to improve the liquid distribution with vertical spray jets…”
Section: Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%