2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of limited-entry multi-cluster fracturing in horizontal well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluid flows in at point 1 and exits at point 2. The calculation equation of the perforation pressure drop is given by [ 24 , 25 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fluid flows in at point 1 and exits at point 2. The calculation equation of the perforation pressure drop is given by [ 24 , 25 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the perforation pressure drop calculation Eq ( 12 ), it can be seen that the number of perforating holes N and the diameter of perforating holes D p are the key factors affecting the frictional resistance of perforating holes that realize the flow distribution adjustment. At the same time, reference [ 14 ] found in the simulation process of the staged multi-cluster fracturing model that the calculation results of perforation clusters on both sides are symmetric and the number of cluster perforations on both sides can be set the same. Finally, three parameters are selected to optimize, respectively, the number of intermediate cluster perforations(A), the number of cluster perforations on both sides(B), and the diameter of intermediate cluster perforations(C).…”
Section: Response Optimization Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, when evaluating fracture injection pressures during SLFTP, effects of previous fracture can be neglected, while pore pressure enhancement, the minimum horizontal principal stress, rock tensile strength, and injection rate must be taken into consideration [43].…”
Section: Factors Influencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In addition, some advanced models have been implemented in various numerical frameworks such as finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), and discrete element method (DEM). In the framework of FEM, adaptive remeshing technique, [17][18][19][20] cohesive element, [21][22][23][24][25] and the partition of unity methods (eg, XFEM and GFEM) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] are the most widely used tools for simulating hydraulic fracturing. Displacement discontinuity method (DDM), a special boundary element method which was first proposed by Crouch et al, 35 is particularly suitable for hydraulic fracture propagation modeling due to its relatively computational efficiency as well as simplicity of meshing and remeshing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%