40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-3818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of HiPEP Ion Optics

Abstract: The ffx code was used to investigate the lifetime and propellant throughput capability of the High Power Electric Propulsion (HiPEP) thruster ion optics as part of NASA's Project Prometheus. Erosion predictions are presented as a function of beamlet current, accel grid voltage, and propellant utilization efficiency. These predictions were then compared to the lifetime goals of the thruster, and for nominal operating conditions, the ffx code indicates that the HiPEP thruster will have propellant throughput capa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in the upstream region, the electron density is given by n e n e0 exp e 0 kT e0 (13) where 0 , n e0 , and T e0 are, respectively, the potential, electron density, and electron temperature of the discharge plasma. The downstream electron density is given by n e n e1 exp e 1 kT e1 (14) where 1 , n e1 , and T e1 are, respectively, the potential, electron density and electron temperature of the downstream neutralized plasma.…”
Section: Modeling Whole Subscale Ion Optics Gridletmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, in the upstream region, the electron density is given by n e n e0 exp e 0 kT e0 (13) where 0 , n e0 , and T e0 are, respectively, the potential, electron density, and electron temperature of the discharge plasma. The downstream electron density is given by n e n e1 exp e 1 kT e1 (14) where 1 , n e1 , and T e1 are, respectively, the potential, electron density and electron temperature of the downstream neutralized plasma.…”
Section: Modeling Whole Subscale Ion Optics Gridletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of plasma flow in ion optics renders particle-in-cell (PIC) [1] based models, which simulate a collisionless plasma by solving plasma particle trajectories, space charge, and the electric field self-consistently as the most appropriate approach for ion optics modeling. Numerous PIC-based ion optics simulation codes have been developed (see, for example, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and references therein). Whereas earlier studies have focused on the physics of a single beamlet, recent studies have also begun to use ion optics models to predict the behavior of entire ion optics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Specific aspects of the HiPEP program are described more thoroughly elsewhere. 6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 This year the JIMO-HiPEP team explored various plasma production options including DC hollow cathode and AC microwave discharge options. 7 Both were used with the HiPEP thruster, demonstrating the applicability of either discharge approach to the rectangular concept.…”
Section: High Power Electric Propulsion System (Hipep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This grid material and geometry is projected to provide the 100 kg/kW xenon throughput at both 8000 and 6000 seconds. 9,10,11,12,13 Analysis by Aerojet has projected that such flat grids, with the proper flight designed thruster, can survive launch with margin. 14 Two different neutralizer concepts were also investigated by HiPEP this year; one using conventional hollow cathodes and two using microwave sources.…”
Section: High Power Electric Propulsion System (Hipep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamamura's sputtering yield formula is a well-known semi-empirical formula in the field of electric propulsion, 18,19) and it has been used widely to evaluate the erosion of molybdenum grids of ion engines. [20][21][22] In the case of sputtering carbon by xenon bombardment, Yamamura's formula is not accurate at and below the threshold energy of 160.84 eV because it does not account for sputtering. However, experimental evidence indicates that the amount of sputtering cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Semi-empirical Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%