2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of concrete encased steel composite columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Composite columns can be steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) or concrete-filled steel sections. In addition to the aforementioned advantages, SRC columns have higher fire resistance and durability, when compared with concrete-filled steel columns (Chen and Lin, 2006;Ellobody and Young, 2011;Naito et al, 2011). Pseudo-static test studies have proved that the bearing capacity and displacement ductility of steel-reinforced high-strength concrete (SRHC) columns are higher than those of reinforced concrete columns (Jia et al, 2006;Zheng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite columns can be steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) or concrete-filled steel sections. In addition to the aforementioned advantages, SRC columns have higher fire resistance and durability, when compared with concrete-filled steel columns (Chen and Lin, 2006;Ellobody and Young, 2011;Naito et al, 2011). Pseudo-static test studies have proved that the bearing capacity and displacement ductility of steel-reinforced high-strength concrete (SRHC) columns are higher than those of reinforced concrete columns (Jia et al, 2006;Zheng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, C3D8R element is selected for meshing steel and concrete component while the reinforcement cage is meshed using T3D2 element. The interfacial bond behavior between encased steel section and concrete is simulated by defining a surface-tosurface contact algorithm with the surrounding concrete functioning as master surface while the encased steel working as slave surface, and the tangential behavior is modelled using penalty formulation with friction coefficient valued 0.25 as adopted by Ellobody et al [12]. Both top and bottom of column are tied to an endplate, which guarantees the uniform force transfer to the entire cross-section.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative slip between the two components was defined by the 'penaltyfriction' formulation [23]. The friction coefficient between steel profiles and concrete is typically in the range μf = 0.2-0.8, which varies with the loading mechanism and test setup [38][39][40]. A value of μf = 0.57 [40] was used as the reference value in all simulations and showed good correlation with the test results.…”
Section: Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%