2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of a trapezoidal cavity receiver for a linear Fresnel solar collector concentrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat loss coefficient shows a downtrend with the increase of inclination of side walls; the influence of cavity depth is negligible, which is consistent with the conclusion of Facão and Oliveira [18]. Among all the cavity models that are simulated in this work, the trapezoidal cavity with 100 mm cavity depth and 20 mm insulation thickness plays the best thermal performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The heat loss coefficient shows a downtrend with the increase of inclination of side walls; the influence of cavity depth is negligible, which is consistent with the conclusion of Facão and Oliveira [18]. Among all the cavity models that are simulated in this work, the trapezoidal cavity with 100 mm cavity depth and 20 mm insulation thickness plays the best thermal performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Heat loss comparison of these two cases proved that a 2D simulation with a constant temperature assumption can accurately model the heat loss from a cavity. This assumption has been widely used by previous researchers without checking its validity [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Cfd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous researchers mostly used the Boussinesq approximation to simulate natural convective flow inside the cavity enclosure [7][8][9] without verifying this assumption. This approximation is accurate when the actual change in density is small:…”
Section: Cfd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Abbas et al about multi-tube receivers, the highest thermal efficiency was obtained at 58% [4]. If Multi-tube receivers are not vacuumed, convection heat lost become high due to radiation is not completely absorbed in the tubes and it is reflected in cavity [5]. Non-vacuum tubes have the most thermal losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%