2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4809975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of a plasma actuator based on ion transport

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inEffect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators on non-equilibrium hypersonic flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies can be grouped by how much detail they use to model the physics associated with the plasma actuator. For example, the kinematic approach is very detailed but computationally very expensive, the continuous model approach that solves the drift-diffusion equations (e.g., Yamamoto andFukagata, 2013, Nishida, Nonomura, and is moderately detailed and computationally expensive, and the continuous model approach that introduces an assumption about the Debye length is less detailed but computationally cheap. This suggests that the degree of detail used to model the plasma actuator should be based on the objectives of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies can be grouped by how much detail they use to model the physics associated with the plasma actuator. For example, the kinematic approach is very detailed but computationally very expensive, the continuous model approach that solves the drift-diffusion equations (e.g., Yamamoto andFukagata, 2013, Nishida, Nonomura, and is moderately detailed and computationally expensive, and the continuous model approach that introduces an assumption about the Debye length is less detailed but computationally cheap. This suggests that the degree of detail used to model the plasma actuator should be based on the objectives of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the kinetic model, the fluid model is computationally cheaper; however, in order to resolve the discharge formation, a sufficiently fine computational grid and a short time step are required. In the previous studies on SDBD plasma actuator using the fluid model, 8,10,13,18,[21][22][23][24][25] both the discharge structure and the generated body force are investigated, but the computational grid spacing used in these studies are significantly different from one another: it ranges from 1 100 µm. It is hardly known whether the results are grid-convergent and it is hard to say whether the obtained results are reasonable enough to analyze the discharge process and the mechanism of body force generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eqs. (2), (3) and (4), μ k (with k=e, p, n) and D k are the mobility and diffusion coefficient of the charged particles, respectively. α and η are the ionization and attachment coefficient, r ep and r pn are the electron-positive ion and positive ion-negative ion recombination coefficients, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drift terms of Eqs. (1), (2) and (3) are evaluated by the upwind scheme with the MUSCL interpolation, and the diffusion terms are evaluated by the central difference scheme. The time integration is conducted by the LU-ADI type implicit scheme to suppress simulation cost.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation