2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation and sensitivity study of double-layer Slinky-coil horizontal ground heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat flux resulting from an algebraic summation of the listed fluxes qcond is transported into the ground (mainly by conduction) or in the opposite direction, depending on its minus/plus sign. The heat balance on the surface of the ground taking into account convection, radiation, and moisture evaporation has the following form [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]:…”
Section: Heat Balance On the Surface Of The Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat flux resulting from an algebraic summation of the listed fluxes qcond is transported into the ground (mainly by conduction) or in the opposite direction, depending on its minus/plus sign. The heat balance on the surface of the ground taking into account convection, radiation, and moisture evaporation has the following form [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]:…”
Section: Heat Balance On the Surface Of The Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded that the average COP of the horizontal-coupled GCHP was 2.5 and there was no significant difference in the heat extraction of the slinky heat exchanger at different coil diameters. Fujii et al [22,23] compared the heat exchange rates of double-layer slinky-coil horizontal GHEs and single-layer horizontal GHEs by long term cooling and heating tests. The results showed that the heat exchange rate per unit land area is obviously improved by using double-layer horizontal GHEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, the use of horizontal GHEs can reduce installation cost and minimize the compromise between increase in efficiency and cost [19][20][21]. Horizontal GHEs are usually installed in a trench approximately 1.5-3 m deep, and their thermal efficiency is affected by pipe configuration, type of pipe, trench depth and ground thermal properties [22][23][24][25]. Among them, Congedo et al [23] analyzed the thermal efficiency of different types of horizontal GHEs using numerical analysis method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%