2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation and fractal analysis of mesoscopic scale failure in shale using digital images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3-D box-counting dimension (BCD) calculations can accurately reflect crack evolution law in the shale. The results indicate that the cracks have a more complex pattern and rough surface at an orientation of 90 • , due to crossed secondary cracks and shear failure.Various experimental methods, e.g., electromagnetic radiation (EMR), acoustic emission (AE), micro-seismic (MS), infrared technique, high speed digital imaging, and computerized tomography (CT), have been used to analyze the mechanical behavior of rocks (including shale) during uniaxial or triaxial loading [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. CT scanning has been widely applied in the investigation of damage propagation since 1997, due to the three-dimensional (3-D) visualization and high-resolution imaging [22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3-D box-counting dimension (BCD) calculations can accurately reflect crack evolution law in the shale. The results indicate that the cracks have a more complex pattern and rough surface at an orientation of 90 • , due to crossed secondary cracks and shear failure.Various experimental methods, e.g., electromagnetic radiation (EMR), acoustic emission (AE), micro-seismic (MS), infrared technique, high speed digital imaging, and computerized tomography (CT), have been used to analyze the mechanical behavior of rocks (including shale) during uniaxial or triaxial loading [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. CT scanning has been widely applied in the investigation of damage propagation since 1997, due to the three-dimensional (3-D) visualization and high-resolution imaging [22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 In Equation (15), S is E 0 , σ c , and K; S 0 is the average value corresponding thereto; and the specific values of the mechanical properties of the sample are shown in Table 1. 31 Table 2 shows the shale compressive strength obtained by the test. The inclination angle α is the angle between the bedding plane and the horizontal direction.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, shale usually contains flaky joints, which causes shale to have different mechanical properties and fracture modes in different directions. [28][29][30] Wu et al 31 used the RFPA2D-DIP numerical software to simulate shale filled with calcite. The shale final failure modes were different under different loading conditions, and the compressive strength showed obvious anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple methods have been used to study the pore structure of coal, including mercury intrusion porosimetry, liquid nitrogen adsorption, nuclear magnetic resonance, electron microscopy, and digital image analysis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging provides unique advantages for the quantitative analyses of pore characteristics in porous media (Wu et al 2016). Highresolution SEM imaging, capable of identifying pores and matrices of different gray levels, has become an important tool for analyzing micro-pore structures (Desbois et al 2011;Pan et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%