2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-018-2402-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation and experimental investigation on spray cooling in the non-boiling region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1995) , can give an acceptable accuracy with a relatively low computational cost ( Pereira et al., 2016 ). Such method has been applied to various applications such as incompressible turbulent simulation ( Silvis et al., 2017 ), water atomization process ( Liu et al., 2018 ), pollutant particle control ( Yin et al., 2019 ), etc. Therefore, it is adopted in this paper to describe the flow pattern within the ward.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1995) , can give an acceptable accuracy with a relatively low computational cost ( Pereira et al., 2016 ). Such method has been applied to various applications such as incompressible turbulent simulation ( Silvis et al., 2017 ), water atomization process ( Liu et al., 2018 ), pollutant particle control ( Yin et al., 2019 ), etc. Therefore, it is adopted in this paper to describe the flow pattern within the ward.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical study in this paper is accomplished by the software of Ansys-Fluent as similar numerical investigation on the ventilation system ( Zhou et al., 2020 ), indoor pollutant control ( Milner et al., 2011 ), and sprayed droplet flow process ( Liu et al., 2018 ), flow dynamics in power system ( Li et al., 2020a ) etc. has been successfully carried out by it.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that except for the gravity force and drag force; the influence of other forces could be ignored in the spray cooling analysis. So the motion equation of one droplet can be expressed as 35 :…”
Section: Discrete Phase Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that except for the gravity force and drag force; the influence of other forces could be ignored in the spray cooling analysis. So the motion equation of one droplet can be expressed as 35 : dvtrue→ddtgoodbreak=Ftrue→Dgoodbreak+Ftrue→g where vtrue→d (m·s −1 ) represents the velocity vector of the droplet, Ftrue→D (kg·m·s −2 ) represents the drag force, and Ftrue→g (kg·m·s −2 ) represents the gravitation force acting on the droplet under the Lagrange framework. Ftrue→D=18μaρddd2CDRed24vtrue→d Ftrue→ggoodbreak=trueg()ρdgoodbreak−ρaρnormald0.25em where ρa (kg·m −3 ) and μa (m·Pa·s) represent the density and viscosity of the continuous phase, dd (m) and ρd (kg·m −3 ) represent the diameter and density of the droplet, CD represents the drag force coefficient, and trueg (m·s −2 ) represents the gravitational acceleration. The particle Reynolds number is related to the relative velocity between the droplet and the air, which is evaluated as:…”
Section: Governing Equations and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady state Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations for mass, momentum, energy, and species transport (water droplet to water vapor) are solved for air, whereas only the energy equation is required for steel slab to account for heat conduction, convection, and radiation. These conservation equations can be expressed in the following general form (Mundo et al, 1997;Liu et al, 2018):…”
Section: Continuous Phasementioning
confidence: 99%