1986
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620231107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical shakedown analysis of axisymmetric sandwich shells: An upper bound formulation

Abstract: SUMMARYShakedown analysis of axisymmetric elastic-perfectly plastic sandwich shells is performed here using a new upper bound formulation based on a special form of Koiter's theorem concerning piecewise linearized yield surfaces. Starting from finite element techniques and the Tresca sandwich yield condition, shakedown analysis is reduced to a linear programming problem which is solved by a powerful simplex algorithm. Numerical results are given for a number of examples and a comparison is made with a previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous kinematic shakedown analyses, linear programming techniques were developed by using piece-wise linear (Tresca) or linearized yield criterion, e.g. [11,23]. The application of von Mises criterion leads to a nonlinear mathematical programming problem, the solution of which in practical engineering applications with complex structures and loading still represents a challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous kinematic shakedown analyses, linear programming techniques were developed by using piece-wise linear (Tresca) or linearized yield criterion, e.g. [11,23]. The application of von Mises criterion leads to a nonlinear mathematical programming problem, the solution of which in practical engineering applications with complex structures and loading still represents a challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left scheme was suggested by K onig and Kleiber [36] and has been applied in a simple step-by-step shakedown analysis [1]. The right one was adopted by Morelle et al [38][39][40] and is used in the present work. Based on the modiÿed kinematical theorem in Section 2, we can give an e ective implementation in a general displacement ÿnite element formulation.…”
Section: Uniÿed Shakedown Limit (Usl Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type of formulation p/ W [14] Lower bound 0·050432 [14] Upper bound 0·05324 [15] Lower bound 0·049624 [15] Upper bound 0·054064 [13] Upper bound 0·048168 [16] Upper bound 0·0518 Present Techn.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%