2014
DOI: 10.1122/1.4869485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical prediction of nonlinear rheology of branched polymer melts

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the flow rate is much slower than the stretch relaxation time, the geometric criteria for assigning the maximum stretch lead to an over-prediction of the extensional hardening for randomly branched polymers, hence flow-dependent modifications of the priority variables are required in order to describe the experimental data [8,40]. However, the available approximation for this flow modification requires vastly different relaxation times (as in industrial randomly branched low density polyethylene) and is not valid for symmetric model polymers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When the flow rate is much slower than the stretch relaxation time, the geometric criteria for assigning the maximum stretch lead to an over-prediction of the extensional hardening for randomly branched polymers, hence flow-dependent modifications of the priority variables are required in order to describe the experimental data [8,40]. However, the available approximation for this flow modification requires vastly different relaxation times (as in industrial randomly branched low density polyethylene) and is not valid for symmetric model polymers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multimode pom-pom description, a set of such pom-pom molecules is considered, and the stress is calculated by a simple sum over stress from each of the pom-pom modes. The numerical calculation for the linear rheology prediction offers a natural choice to resolve the molecules in terms of multiple independent pom-pom modes [8,40]: the parts of the molecules relaxing at a certain time tc have orientation relaxation time o = tc ; the time at which these parts (segments) can move coherently with the chain ends define the stretch relaxation time s. In addition, the branching topology from the currently relaxing segments define the maximum stretch q as the priority variables [53], and the modulus relaxed in this time interval sets the modulus of the pom-pom mode. Based on the pompom model [13], equating the maximum tension with the tension along the backbone gives a maximum stretch of q.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An additional piece of physics not included in the present model (nor in the original pom-pom model) is the nested tube structure and different types of stress relaxation suggested by constraint release within the dynamic dilution approximation. In the linear rheological limit, stress is relaxed both by tube escape and by constraint release [Das et al (2014)]. It seems probable that, in nonlinear flow, such effects would couple with the ES identified within the present work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%