2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical prediction of aft radiation of turbofan tones through exhaust jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation models the transport of physical quantities along a 1D domain. We expect that this model adequately captures the behaviour of the oscillations of the vortex sheet in the problem of interest (17).…”
Section: Streamline Upwind Petrov-galerkinmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This equation models the transport of physical quantities along a 1D domain. We expect that this model adequately captures the behaviour of the oscillations of the vortex sheet in the problem of interest (17).…”
Section: Streamline Upwind Petrov-galerkinmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The PML can also be used to impose the incident wave. In practice, the PML equations are applied to the reflected field only [13,15]: q re = q − q in , where q in is the incident field and q re is the reflected field. The Linearised Euler Equations for incident wave injection in the PML are: 4.…”
Section: Perfectly Matched Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple test cases therefore allow an exact comparison between the numerical simulation and an analytic solution, one of the simplest of which is that of an oblique plane wave reflecting from an impedance surface [29]; a number of common validations for 2D and 3D time-dependent numerical acoustics simulations with flow are described by Richter [19, chapter 7.1], and similar validations are also used in 2D and 3D frequency-domain simulations [e.g. 30]. However, while these situations are sufficiently simple to permit an exact closed-form analytical expression for the pressure field, all of these tests rely on accurately introducing an incoming acoustic wave at the boundary of the numerical domain, while many of them also do not test the correct simulation of surface waves, do not test the impedance surface at a range of axial wavelengths, nor test correct propagation to the far field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%