1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7278-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
665
0
29

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 924 publications
(740 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
665
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (12), (18) and (22), together with the boundary conditions (15)(16)(17), (19)(20), (23) and (24), are solved numerically using an implicit, iterative tri-diagonal finite difference method similar to that discussed in Refs. [47,48]. Although not shown here, the full solution of the momentum equations in three dimensions reveals that the component G is rather negligible (see Ref.…”
Section: Self-similar Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equations (12), (18) and (22), together with the boundary conditions (15)(16)(17), (19)(20), (23) and (24), are solved numerically using an implicit, iterative tri-diagonal finite difference method similar to that discussed in Refs. [47,48]. Although not shown here, the full solution of the momentum equations in three dimensions reveals that the component G is rather negligible (see Ref.…”
Section: Self-similar Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was such that when the difference between the two consecutive iterations became less than 10 -7 , the solution was assumed to have converged and hence the iterative process was terminated. On the basis of the implemented numerical scheme, the numerical error is of O Dg ð Þ 2 [46,47]. The solutions developed in Sects.…”
Section: Grid Independency and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation for can be derived in a similar manner. Using , a finite-difference Crank-Nicolson scheme (Thomas, 1995) for Eqn. (6) can be obtained as:…”
Section: Bpm Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neumann-type boundary condition is imposed on the boundary of the current block-centered grid system because the outmost nodes of the grid system are not located on the boundary of the considered domain but at the central points of the boundary blocks (Wang and Anderson, 1982;Thomas, 1995). The impervious boundary is simulated using the added imaginary blocks outside the considered domain.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%