2011
DOI: 10.2528/pierb11060505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Optimization of the Method of Auxiliary Sources by Using Level Set Technique

Abstract: Abstract-It is well-known that the choice of the auxiliary surface and the arrangement of radiation centers play a decisive role for ensuring accuracy and stability of the method of auxiliary sources (MAS). Using level set technique, a numerical scheme is proposed to determine the optimal location and amplitudes of the auxiliary sources for threedimensional scattering problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattered field has phase centers located in the ellipsoid foci's region [8]. The Figure 5 shows the auxiliary surface evolution at 0, 23, 50 and 70 iterations.…”
Section: Singularities Localization Of An Elliptical Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scattered field has phase centers located in the ellipsoid foci's region [8]. The Figure 5 shows the auxiliary surface evolution at 0, 23, 50 and 70 iterations.…”
Section: Singularities Localization Of An Elliptical Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the accuracy is not automatically adjustable, the only degree of freedom is the auxiliary sources' amplitudes. Generally, The standard MAS is based on empirical rules and on the caustic concept leading to the following recommendation [8]: The distance d between the physical surface Γ and the auxillary surface S should satisfy the condition d < R min , where R min is the minimal radius of positive curvature of the surface Γ. Several numerical methods have been proposed to overcome these constraints for the case of two-dimensional scattering problems, such as [9,10].…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations