2013
DOI: 10.1002/er.3064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical optimization of axial turbine with self-pitch-controlled blades used for wave energy conversion

Abstract: SUMMARY Wells turbines are among the most practical wave energy converters despite their low aerodynamic efficiency and power produced. It is proposed to improve the performance of Wells turbines by optimizing the blade pitch angle. Optimization is implemented using a fully automated optimization algorithm. Two different airfoil geometries are numerically investigated: the standard NACA 0021 and an airfoil with an optimized profile. Numerical results show that each airfoil has its own optimum blade pitch angle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts have been made to increase the performance of the Wells turbine by changing duct geometry [2], designing monoplane and biplane Wells turbine [3], optimizing blade profile and thickness [4], modifying airfoil profile [5e7], making non-symmetric airfoil blade shape [8] and non-uniform tip gap [9], inserting end plate [10], sweeping [11,12], changing blade pitch angle [13,14], etc. Other efforts involve modification of guide vane angle [15e17], bidirectional flow [18], variable chord [19], bi-plane unidirectional blade [20], counter rotating blade [21,22], hysteretic behavior with unsteady flow [23], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made to increase the performance of the Wells turbine by changing duct geometry [2], designing monoplane and biplane Wells turbine [3], optimizing blade profile and thickness [4], modifying airfoil profile [5e7], making non-symmetric airfoil blade shape [8] and non-uniform tip gap [9], inserting end plate [10], sweeping [11,12], changing blade pitch angle [13,14], etc. Other efforts involve modification of guide vane angle [15e17], bidirectional flow [18], variable chord [19], bi-plane unidirectional blade [20], counter rotating blade [21,22], hysteretic behavior with unsteady flow [23], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better understanding and comparison between turbines with different blade profiles, the turbine damping coefficient and the critical pneumatic power are presented in normalized forms in Figures 12 and 13. The normalized turbine damping coefficient B* represents the ratio between the turbine damping coefficient B T [Equation (15)] and the damping coefficient of the original turbine B T,original…”
Section: The Percentage Change Of the Pressure Drop Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical optimization algorithm based on CFD simulation is implemented in order to optimize the blade pitch angle in [126]. The standard NACA 0021 and an optimized profile (AOP) are numerically investigated.…”
Section: Setting Pitch Angles For Bladementioning
confidence: 99%