Advancing Culture of Living With Landslides 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53485-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Models of Unstable Slopes in Seismic Areas—Based on 3D Geomodels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of sections extracted from the 3D geomodels, slope failure processes may then be examined through complete back-analysis in order to assess the likelihood of a seismic trigger for those landslides. Related results are presented in a companion publication by Havenith et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of sections extracted from the 3D geomodels, slope failure processes may then be examined through complete back-analysis in order to assess the likelihood of a seismic trigger for those landslides. Related results are presented in a companion publication by Havenith et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A complete back-analysis was carried out to assess the possibility of a seismic triggering of the landslide. The related numerical simulations will be exemplified with the case study applied to the Bévercé landslide (HFZ, Belgium) in a companion publication (Havenith et al 2017).…”
Section: Studied Sites General Context Of the Sites And Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the enormous impact potential of giant landslides, especially of those triggered during earthquakes, relatively little effort is spent to predict them. Thus, only very few case histories are known where large sites (>1 km 2 ) had been thoroughly investigated to assess their failure potential under dynamic conditions, in full 3D (Havenith et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%