2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of thermophoresis in water-alumina nanofluid under pool boiling conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicting of bubble departure diameter in the present model was successfully done by comparison of the incorporated UDF by using Eq. (22) for the current extended model and the experimental data of Gerardi et al [37], which are used for silica and graphene nanofluids under atmospheric pressure condition. Figure 6 shows the bubble departure diameter against superheat temperature for the present model compared to experimental data, and the average absolute deviation was about 11% between the current model and the experimental data in the literature.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predicting of bubble departure diameter in the present model was successfully done by comparison of the incorporated UDF by using Eq. (22) for the current extended model and the experimental data of Gerardi et al [37], which are used for silica and graphene nanofluids under atmospheric pressure condition. Figure 6 shows the bubble departure diameter against superheat temperature for the present model compared to experimental data, and the average absolute deviation was about 11% between the current model and the experimental data in the literature.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gobinath et al [22] studied the thermodiffusion (soreteffect) of water-alumina nanofluid at sub-cooled pool boiling conditions numerically. They conducted an experimental investigation of pool boiling on a horizontal tube with various subcooled temperatures for alumina nanofluid to validate their model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the subcooled boiling conditions, the heat transfer rate of nanofluid enhanced with ultrasonic technique while for saturated boiling condition ultrasonic was not much effective at high heat flux conditions. Gobinath et al [15] performed the thermophoresis in the nanofluid to solve the mathematical model conditions. Thermophoretic parameters like thermophoretic mobility and thermophoretic velocity was observed at different temperature value of boiling surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They figured out that increasing nanoparticle concentration from 0% to 1% caused vapor volume fraction and heat transfer coefficient to increase. Gobinath et al (2018) performed experiments for different heater conditions and numerically analyzed the thermophoresis of aqueous alumina nanofluid under subcooled pool boiling conditions. They used ANSYS Fluent CFD software in numerical analysis and 2-D steady pressure-based implicit solver with Gauss–Seidel iterative procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%