2013
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of perimeter pile groups in clay

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link AbstractThe load distribution among piles in a group varies such that the inner piles often carry a smaller share of the total load compared to the exterior piles, which is a result of increased soil-pile interaction. The main objective of this paper is to establish the relative effectiveness of pile groups with no inner piles (perimeter group), when compared to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the load-strain mechanism, only the part of the strain energy corresponding to the linear elastic response is recovered [14]. On the contrary, the load transferring mechanism has been investigated using numerical analysis and experimental works with considering the strength of materials and shape of the modeling [15][16][17][18], and this phenomenon significantly influences on concrete footingsoil foundation interaction. But due to characteristics of soil during loading, unloading, and reloading process, and change compression loading to tensile loading in very short times, the crack on soil due to tensile loading and fatigue of soil cannot be explained same as which is presented in the literature, about crack and fatigue on metal [19][20][21].…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Discussion and Verification Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the load-strain mechanism, only the part of the strain energy corresponding to the linear elastic response is recovered [14]. On the contrary, the load transferring mechanism has been investigated using numerical analysis and experimental works with considering the strength of materials and shape of the modeling [15][16][17][18], and this phenomenon significantly influences on concrete footingsoil foundation interaction. But due to characteristics of soil during loading, unloading, and reloading process, and change compression loading to tensile loading in very short times, the crack on soil due to tensile loading and fatigue of soil cannot be explained same as which is presented in the literature, about crack and fatigue on metal [19][20][21].…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Discussion and Verification Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the computational cost within acceptable accuracy, computationally efficient 8-noded hexahedral elements with linear displacement and pore pressure degrees of freedom (C3D8P) were deemed to be sufficient to model the coupled behaviour for the conditions of working stress (serviceability) focused in the present study. This finite element idealization approach has been extensively used in many recent papers addressing the similar issues of modelling piled embankments or foundations (e.g., Zhuang, 2009;Ye et al, 2013;Thach et al, 2013;Rose et al, 2013;Tho et al, 2014). Quadratic elements would have been needed had the ultimate limit state been examined in the present paper.…”
Section: Mesh Discretization Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ere are many experimental, numerical, and theoretical research studies which mainly focus on differential settlement and bearing capacity of the soil when the soil has been subjected to simulated seismic loading, liquefaction, and landslide. e outcome of these research studies has been realizing failure mitigation of soil foundation and introducing different methods for improving soil foundation stability [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Using research idea from different branches of science and applying them in geotechnical earthquake engineering is an acceptable research methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%