2015
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-3-171-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of glacial lake outburst floods using physically based dam-breach models

Abstract: Abstract. The instability of moraine-dammed proglacial lakes creates the potential for catastrophic glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) in high-mountain regions. In this research, we use a unique combination of numerical dam-breach and two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling, employed within a generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework, to quantify predictive uncertainty in model outputs associated with a reconstruction of the Dig Tsho failure in Nepal. Monte Carlo analysis was used to samp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(174 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of instantaneous dam failure, such as we have made here, may be appropriate for examining flood hazard and hydraulics downstream because it represents a worse-case scenario of breaching and provides maximum estimates for peak discharge and flow depth downstream. However, this treatment of the dam failure could be improved with more sophisticated empirical dam breaching models (e.g., Froehlich, 2016;Westoby et al, 2015), particularly if parameters related to the geometry and composition of the dam are known. The precise timescale of the Yigong dam failure is unclear (Delaney & Evans, 2015;Shang et al, 2003;Zhu et al, 2003) and likely <1 hr, but future simulations could investigate the effects of different breaching rates and dam parameters on downstream flow conditions.…”
Section: 1029/2018jf004778mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of instantaneous dam failure, such as we have made here, may be appropriate for examining flood hazard and hydraulics downstream because it represents a worse-case scenario of breaching and provides maximum estimates for peak discharge and flow depth downstream. However, this treatment of the dam failure could be improved with more sophisticated empirical dam breaching models (e.g., Froehlich, 2016;Westoby et al, 2015), particularly if parameters related to the geometry and composition of the dam are known. The precise timescale of the Yigong dam failure is unclear (Delaney & Evans, 2015;Shang et al, 2003;Zhu et al, 2003) and likely <1 hr, but future simulations could investigate the effects of different breaching rates and dam parameters on downstream flow conditions.…”
Section: 1029/2018jf004778mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dig Tsho (86 • 35.1 E, 27 • 52.5 N, 4365.9 m a.s.l.) has been extensively studied and used as a site to assess and improve GLOF models (Cenderelli and Wohl, 2001;Bajracharya et al, 2007;Westoby et al, 2014Westoby et al, , 2015Watson et al, 2015). Chamlang South Tsho (86 • 57.5 E,27 • 45.3 N,4951.8 m a.s.l.)…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have been developed to characterize the hazard and risk associated with glacial lakes in Cordillera Blanca (Reynolds, 2003;Hegglin and Huggel, 2008;Vilímek, 2013, 2014), New Zealand (Allen et al, 2009), North America (Clague and Evans, 2000;O'Connor et al, 2001;McKillop and Clague, 2007a, b), the Swiss Alps (Huggel et al, 2004b;Nussbaumer et al, 2014), the Himalaya (Wang et al, 2008(Wang et al, , 2012ICIMOD, 2011;Fujita et al, 2013;Worni et al, 2013), the Tibetan Plateau (Wang et al, 2011), and other parts of high-mountain Asia (Bolch et al, 2011;Mergili and Schneider, 2011). These methods vary considerably based on the parameters considered, the level of importance placed upon each parameter, the amount and type of required input data, their ability to be transferred to other regions, and their levels of objectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining outflow volume, breach depth, and breach rate usually requires detailed field surveys to constrain the lake bathymetry and dam properties; clearly this is impossible given the setting and number of lakes in our study. Instead, we explicitly quantify these uncertainties by sampling from probability distributions that we derived from published data (Huggel et al 2002, O'Connor and Beebee 2009, Sakai 2012) using a Monte-Carlo simulation (Westoby et al 2014b(Westoby et al , 2015) (see supplementary information). Our probabilistic model (figures S1-3, table S1) computes for each lake 100 000 dam-breach simulations with differing values of corresponding peak discharge and outburst volume (Walder and O'Connor 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%