2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of failure propagation in fully grouted rock bolts subjected to tensile load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He established that load-displacement distribution at the interface of the bolt and anchor could be a solution [7]. In Nemcik's study, the nonlinear bond-slip constitutive model is combined with FLAC2D to simulate the failure transmission law of a full-length anchored rock under tension [8]. Hu reported a low-viscosity and highstrength anchoring agent using fine stone powder as an aggregate, increasing the amount of resin to improve the consistency of the anchoring agent and compensating for the decrease in resin strength due to a lack of coarse aggregates by increasing the degree of polymerization of the resin [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He established that load-displacement distribution at the interface of the bolt and anchor could be a solution [7]. In Nemcik's study, the nonlinear bond-slip constitutive model is combined with FLAC2D to simulate the failure transmission law of a full-length anchored rock under tension [8]. Hu reported a low-viscosity and highstrength anchoring agent using fine stone powder as an aggregate, increasing the amount of resin to improve the consistency of the anchoring agent and compensating for the decrease in resin strength due to a lack of coarse aggregates by increasing the degree of polymerization of the resin [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curves 1 and 1 in Figure 1(a) show the interfacial stress distribution mode; the former indicates a case that the pullout load is relatively low, whereas the latter indicates a case that the overlarge pullout load leads to certain amount of interfacial bonding failure. It has been completely testified that the peak bonding shear stress will gradually move from loading end to the free-loading end for a bolt subjected tensile load [10]; then a complete bonding failure should firstly occur at a section close to the loading end, causing a zero shear stress at the beginning of curve 1 , which is then followed by certain range of partial bonding failure towards the peak stress point. Beyond the section, the shear stress decreases exponentially to the free-loading end in accordance with Farmer's solution [7].…”
Section: Mechanical Differences Between Bolt In Pullout Test and Boltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, laboratory pullout test is utilized to investigate the reinforcement effects of bolts. Regardless of the great number of pullout tests conducted around the world in various types [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], certain mechanical differences between bolt in pullout test and bolt in situ should be noted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear stress on anchor surface in the pull-out process can be divided into three parts: cohesion, mechanical self-locking force, and friction force [3]. Many mechanical models have been proposed: the shear lag model for an anchoring system based on the condition of considering bonding conditions of different interfaces [4], the simple trilinear constitutive model that describe the shear slip of the bonding interface between the anchor cable and grouting body [5], the stick-slip relationship and the trilinear stick-slip model established through pull-out tests on anchor bolts [6,7], the three-parameter and two-parameter combined-power models of the distribution of axial force within the anchorage zone [8], the hyperbolic function model of load transfer by using mathematical-mechanical methods [9]. Zhu(2009) derived a function describing the distribution of frictional resistance on anchor bolts in an elastic homogeneous rock mass [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%