2016
DOI: 10.15199/48.2016.08.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of dielecrophoresis (DEP) effect in microchannel flow controller - comparison of calculation methods

Abstract: Results of calculations using Maxwell stress tensor method for a new DEP based flow control device with the distance between the electrodes equal to 400m and the relative permittivity of the liquid (2-propanol) equal to 19.9 are presented. The analysis of the influence of the electric field and the shape of the meniscus on the forces acting on the liquid surface and the liquid height-of-rise for several voltage values is presented. The results show good agreement with these obtained using simplified method.St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results agreed perfectly in all cases. The calculations were performed for the same liquid that was used in the microchannel described in [21][22][23], namely isopropanol. Its physical properties were taken assuming a temperature of 25 °C and are as follows (Dortmund Data Bank http://ddbonline.ddbst.com): the density 786 kg m −3 , surface tension 20.9 mN m −1 , dynamic viscosity 2.34 mPa s, relative electric permittivity 19.9 and contact angle 0 rad [46].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results agreed perfectly in all cases. The calculations were performed for the same liquid that was used in the microchannel described in [21][22][23], namely isopropanol. Its physical properties were taken assuming a temperature of 25 °C and are as follows (Dortmund Data Bank http://ddbonline.ddbst.com): the density 786 kg m −3 , surface tension 20.9 mN m −1 , dynamic viscosity 2.34 mPa s, relative electric permittivity 19.9 and contact angle 0 rad [46].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an optim ization of this device, particularly with the goal to control its time-response properties, is required because the controller is meant as a part of a feedback system for temperature regulation. To this end, knowledge of the influence of the forces on the liquid height-of-rise is necessary because its value is correlated with the liquid flow rate in the controller [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, optimization of this device, particularly with the goal to control its time-response properties, is required if the controller is to be treated as a part of a feed-back system for temperature regulation. To this end, knowledge of the influence of the forces on the fluid height of rise is necessary because its value is correlated with the liquid flow rate in the controller [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%