2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9703-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of centrifuge tests on tunnel–soil systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the effective ground motion at the foundation level it is necessary to investigate Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (DSSI). Since the 1970s, DSSI has been investigated by means of theoretical approaches [Veletsos et al, 1974;Gazetas, 1983;Gazetas et al, 1991;Chatterjee et al, 2008;Voyagaki et al, 2013;Renzi et al, 2013], numerical modeling [Martin et al, 2001;Gazetas et al, 2004;Gajan et al, 2005Gajan et al, , 2008Massimino, 2005;Maugeri et al, 2012;Calvi et al;Abate et al, 2015] as well as field and laboratory tests àCombescure et al, 2000;Faccioli et al, 2001;Prasad et al, 2004;Kutter et al, 2006;Ueng et al, 2006;Bienen et al, 2007;Ugalde et al, 2007;Anastasopoulos et al, 2013]. Particularly, numerical modeling of full-coupled soil-structure systems represent the most precious approach, being the nearest to the actual configurations to be analyzed [Abate et al, 2016[Abate et al, , 2017c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the effective ground motion at the foundation level it is necessary to investigate Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (DSSI). Since the 1970s, DSSI has been investigated by means of theoretical approaches [Veletsos et al, 1974;Gazetas, 1983;Gazetas et al, 1991;Chatterjee et al, 2008;Voyagaki et al, 2013;Renzi et al, 2013], numerical modeling [Martin et al, 2001;Gazetas et al, 2004;Gajan et al, 2005Gajan et al, , 2008Massimino, 2005;Maugeri et al, 2012;Calvi et al;Abate et al, 2015] as well as field and laboratory tests àCombescure et al, 2000;Faccioli et al, 2001;Prasad et al, 2004;Kutter et al, 2006;Ueng et al, 2006;Bienen et al, 2007;Ugalde et al, 2007;Anastasopoulos et al, 2013]. Particularly, numerical modeling of full-coupled soil-structure systems represent the most precious approach, being the nearest to the actual configurations to be analyzed [Abate et al, 2016[Abate et al, , 2017c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical or numerical approaches (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]) are powerful tools even if the obtained results are affected by the reliability of the data and by the analysis assumptions. Monitoring of full-scale structures is frequently characterized by unknown boundary conditions and requires a large monitoring period which is a rare occurrence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting for deformation of soil and foundation, full-coupled soilstructure shaking table tests [5][6][7][8] and numerical analysis [9][10][11][12] were conducted and gained deeper insight into the seismic performance of structures. With soil intervention, vibration period of the whole model extends and thus influences authentic seismic responses of superstructures.…”
Section: Jiang and Xumentioning
confidence: 99%