2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling and in-depth analysis of multi-stack vanadium flow battery module incorporating transport delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are many considerations that increase the complexity of the model and bring inconvenience to practical applications. Therefore, optimizing the existing hybrid model is a key measure to improve model efficiency 86 …”
Section: Analysis and Research On Performance Improvement Methods Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are many considerations that increase the complexity of the model and bring inconvenience to practical applications. Therefore, optimizing the existing hybrid model is a key measure to improve model efficiency 86 …”
Section: Analysis and Research On Performance Improvement Methods Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al 146 studied the characteristics and performance of a 10 kW stack consisting of 14 batteries, with an EE of more than 80%, indicating that the VRFB is a promising and efficient energy storage technology. Chen et al 147 found the phenomenon of transmission delay in multistack RFBs. Transmission delay will lead to uneven concentration distribution along the pipeline, resulting in poor uniformity of stack pressure in the module, which will lead to a premature pressure cutoff during operation and reduce capacity utilization.…”
Section: ■ Operational Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Figure 1 Visual representation of the dilute vs. concentrated debate in flow battery modeling literature Papers are ordered in 4 categories. (A) Papers using the dilute solution hypothesis without mentioning it; 2000–2010: [6] Sukkar and Skyllas-Kazacos (2003) , [7] Li and Hikihara (2008) , [8] You et al (2009) ; 2010–2015: [11] Tang et al (2011) , [12] Qiu et al (2012) , [13] Tang et al (2012) , [14] Badrinarayanan et al (2014) ; 2015-2018: [26] Zhou et al (2016) , [27] Nikonenko et al (2016) , [28] Yan et al (2016) , [29] Milshtein et al (2017) , [30] Bhattacharjee and Saha (2017) ; 2018-2022: [45] Lei et al (2018) , [46] Murali et al (2018) , [47] Chen et al (2019) [48] Xu et al (2020) [49] Chen et al (2021a) , [50] Chen et al (2021b) [51] Howard Amanda and Tartakovsky (2021) . (B) Papers mentioning the dilute solution hypothesis but not justifying it; 2000–2010: [9] Shah et al (2008) , [10] Al-Fetlawi et al (2009) ; 2010–2015: [15] Shah et al (2011) , [16] Vynnycky (2011) , [17] Knehr et al (2012) , [18] Yin et al (2014) [19] Chen et al (2014) ; 2015-2018: [31] Xu and Zhao (2015) , [32] Yang et al (2015) , [33] Boettcher et al (2015) , [34] Zhou et al (2015) , [35] Lei (2015) , [36] Gandomi et al (2016) , [37] Chu et al (2016) , [38] Chen et al (2017) , [39] Elgammal et al (2017) ; 2018-2022: [52] Ronen et al (2018) , [53] Oh et al (2019) , [54] Delgado et al (2020) , [55] Cacciuttolo et al (2021) .
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Papers are ordered in 4 categories. (A) Papers using the dilute solution hypothesis without mentioning it; 2000–2010: [6] Sukkar and Skyllas-Kazacos (2003) , [7] Li and Hikihara (2008) , [8] You et al (2009) ; 2010–2015: [11] Tang et al (2011) , [12] Qiu et al (2012) , [13] Tang et al (2012) , [14] Badrinarayanan et al (2014) ; 2015-2018: [26] Zhou et al (2016) , [27] Nikonenko et al (2016) , [28] Yan et al (2016) , [29] Milshtein et al (2017) , [30] Bhattacharjee and Saha (2017) ; 2018-2022: [45] Lei et al (2018) , [46] Murali et al (2018) , [47] Chen et al (2019) [48] Xu et al (2020) [49] Chen et al (2021a) , [50] Chen et al (2021b) [51] Howard Amanda and Tartakovsky (2021) . …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%