2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling and experimental verification of blown film processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can explain why the bubble wants to avoid such a situation and an unstable bubble formation may be a way of doing it. This example suggests that the critical points mentioned above may be connected with bubble instabilities widely described in literature [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] but, of course, more detailed investigation is needed to support such an idea.…”
Section: Theoretical Behavior Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can explain why the bubble wants to avoid such a situation and an unstable bubble formation may be a way of doing it. This example suggests that the critical points mentioned above may be connected with bubble instabilities widely described in literature [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] but, of course, more detailed investigation is needed to support such an idea.…”
Section: Theoretical Behavior Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It is interesting to note that instabilities have been experimentally identified for BUR close to 1 [5]. According to the model prediction, infinite force is needed to achieve such a state.…”
Section: Theoretical Behavior Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only difference is definition of pJ(p J ) value, where the additional parameter E appears in case of Eqs. (5) and (6). In the next section, main attention is paid to the high stalk bubble, i.e.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first film blowing model was developed in 1970 by Pearson and Petrie [4][5][6] utilizing isothermal processing conditions, a Newtonian model as the constitutive equation, assuming the film as a thin shell in tension and neglecting the effect of inertia, surface tension, air drag, and gravity. This formulation became a basic idea for many researchers (see summarization provided in Muke et al [7]), such as Pearson and Gutteridge (1978) [8], Cao and Campbell (1990) [9], Liu et al (1995) [10], or in the last years e.g. Muslet and Kamal (2004) [11], Beaulne and Mitsoulis (2007) [12], Sarafrazi and Sharif (2008) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%