2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb018560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of Mantle Flow Beneath Madagascar to Constrain Upper Mantle Rheology Beneath Continental Regions

Abstract: Over the past few decades, azimuthal seismic anisotropy measurements have been widely used proxy to study past and present‐day deformation of the lithosphere and to characterize convection in the mantle. Beneath continental regions, distinguishing between shallow and deep sources of anisotropy remains difficult due to poor depth constraints of measurements and a lack of regional‐scale geodynamic modeling. Here, we constrain the sources of seismic anisotropy beneath Madagascar where a complex pattern cannot be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(220 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Rocco et al (2017) infer a local maximum lithospheric thickness of 60 km based upon the absence of garnet-bearing peridotitic xenoliths from magmatic rocks in northern Madagascar. This value is ∼30 km thinner than that calculated by Priestley and M c Kenzie (2013), but in closer agreement with the results of Rajaonarison et al (2020) and Hoggard et al (2020), who calculate thicknesses of <80 km beneath the northern and central highlands. Note that these three studies exploited different surface wave tomographic models to obtain lithospheric thickness estimates.…”
Section: Receiver Function Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, Rocco et al (2017) infer a local maximum lithospheric thickness of 60 km based upon the absence of garnet-bearing peridotitic xenoliths from magmatic rocks in northern Madagascar. This value is ∼30 km thinner than that calculated by Priestley and M c Kenzie (2013), but in closer agreement with the results of Rajaonarison et al (2020) and Hoggard et al (2020), who calculate thicknesses of <80 km beneath the northern and central highlands. Note that these three studies exploited different surface wave tomographic models to obtain lithospheric thickness estimates.…”
Section: Receiver Function Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Adjacent to the central Madagascan volcanic province, a circular fast wavespeed anomaly exists ( δV P ≥1.5%), centered at ∼19°S, 48°E. This feature extends to the northeast with depth and is located beneath thicker lithosphere (∼120 km) than is present below adjacent magmatic provinces (Rajaonarison et al., 2020). Resolution tests (Figure demonstrate that this feature is not likely an inversion artifact, although anomaly amplitude appears to be strongly influenced by the crustal correction (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial melt in the model is tracked through the compositional field called "porosity." The viscosity at each quadrature point is calculated from the effective value of the viscosity of the compositional fields weighted by the volume fraction of each composition at the same location (Figures 4a and 4b; Rajaonarison et al, 2020).…”
Section: Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%